Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 DECEMBER 2018

Senate Banking Committee Considers Reforms To Proxy Voting Process

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Experts debated the role of proxy advisory firms and other shareholder voting issues before the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Community Affairs.

United StatesFinance and Banking

Experts debated the role of proxy advisory firms and other shareholder voting issues before the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Community Affairs.

Former SEC Commissioner Daniel M. Gallagher advocated for "rein[ing] in" some of the proxy advisory firms' "unfettered power" in shareholder voting. He approved of the SEC's recent withdrawal of the 2004 Egan-Jones and ISS staff no-action letters ("2004 no-action letters") that had provided protection to investment advisers that use proxy advice in formulating their own voting. Mr. Gallagher urged the SEC to:

  • revisit what he described as the "special and privileged role" accorded proxy advisers (a deference he described as similar to that granted to rating agencies before the market crash);

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from