Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 MAY 2022

SEC Proposes Significant Amendments To The Fund Names Rule

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

On May 25, 2022, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed significant amendments seeking to enhance Rule 35d-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act), ...

United StatesFinance and Banking

On May 25, 2022, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed significant amendments seeking to enhance Rule 35d-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act), the "Names Rule" governing registered fund names. A summary of various components of the sweeping proposals follows.

Expansion of Fund Names Requiring 80% Investment Policy

The proposed amendments would expand the types of names that are subject to the Names Rule's requirements for adopting an 80% investment policy to also include names suggesting a focus in investments or issuers that have particular characteristics, in addition to fund names currently subject to an 80% investment policy. Thus, registered funds whose names suggest a focus in a particular type of investment characteristic or style (e.g., "global," "income," "intermediate (term)," "growth," "value") or that reflect use of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors (e.g., "ESG," "social,"

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from