Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 OCTOBER 2022

Revlon Erroneous Payment Decision Reversed On Appeal

Torys
Torys
Contributor
Torys

Torys

Torys LLP is an international business law firm that works with clients who expect the best advice...

View firm profile
Explore more from Torys

On February 16, 2021, the Southern District ruled against Citibank holding that the "discharge for value" exception to the equitable principle applied.

United StatesFinance and Banking

On September 8, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed and remanded a ruling by the Southern District of New York that had allowed lenders to reap the benefits of Citibank's $1 billion mistake.

What you need to know

In August 2020, acting as agent under the $2 billion Revlon credit facility, Citibank intended to transfer Revlon's $8 million payment of accrued interest to the Revlon lenders when it accidentally included $900 million of its own money in payment of the outstanding principal amount. Citibank alerted the lenders of the mistake and sued those that refused to return the funds, arguing that equitable principles required the recipients of erroneous payments to return them.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from