Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 APRIL 2010

Regulatory Responses to Perceived Issues in the Securities Lending Market

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

Institutional investors, including pension and mutual funds, have historically viewed securities lending as a relatively low-risk method to increase the returns on their securities portfolios.

United StatesFinance and Banking
Neeraj Kumar
Neeraj Kumar
David Trapini
David Trapini
Author LinkedIn connections

Institutional investors, including pension and mutual funds, have historically viewed securities lending as a relatively low-risk method to increase the returns on their securities portfolios. In a typical securities lending transaction, one party (the securities lender) loans specific securities to the other party (the securities borrower) in exchange for collateral. To the extent that non-cash collateral is used, the securities lender receives a loan fee under the transaction. However, to the extent that cash collateral is used, the securities lender pays a cash collateral fee (also know as a rebate fee) to the securities borrower. Thus, an implicit element of cash collateralized securities loans is the reinvestment of the cash collateral by the securities lender or by an agent of the securities lender.1

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from