Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 APRIL 2026

No Guarantee: Caution From Second Circuit For Lenders Relying On Unsecured Guarantees

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

A U.S. appellate court recently issued a cautionary decision for lenders depending on unsecured guarantees by parent companies and affiliates of their borrowers.

United StatesFinance and Banking

A U.S. appellate court recently issued a cautionary decision for lenders depending on unsecured guarantees by parent companies and affiliates of their borrowers. In Leadenhall Capital Partners LLP v. Advantage Capital Holdings, LLC, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated a district court’s preliminary injunction that froze guarantors’ assets to prevent their dissipation before final judgment. 

To reach this result, the Second Circuit applied the long-standing rule of Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo, S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 (1999). In Grupo Mexicano, the U.S. Supreme Court held that federal courts have no authority to preliminarily enjoin assets absent a lien or equitable interest. The Second Circuit in Leadenhall  extended that rule to secured creditors seeking to freeze assets held by a guarantor that had not pledged any of its owncollateral.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from