Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 APRIL 2026

Navigating Interval Fund Governance: Key Considerations For Fund Directors

Dechert
Dechert
Contributor
Dechert

Dechert

Dechert helps business leaders lead For more than 150 years, we’ve advised the innovators who move...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dechert

Private markets and closed-end interval funds have seen significant expansion, with the SEC's Investor Advisory Committee endorsing registered interval funds as an optimal vehicle for retail investors seeking private market exposure.

United StatesFinance and Banking

Private markets have experienced rapid growth, and so have closed-end interval funds. The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Investor Advisory Committee has called registered interval funds an “optimal way for retail investors to access private market assets.”1 Many mutual fund sponsors have begun sponsoring, or are considering sponsoring, interval funds for the first time, and may ask their existing mutual fund directors to sit on boards of such funds.

For independent directors accustomed to overseeing registered open-end mutual funds, the governance landscape shifts when considering registered closed-end interval funds. While interval funds share certain regulatory foundations with traditional mutual funds under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act), their investment strategies, operational complexities, and liquidity mechanisms require different board oversight approaches. Understanding these distinctions is essential for any director considering service on an

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from