Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 SEPTEMBER 2021

Hedging Derivatives Under Rule 18f-4: Not An "All Or None" Exclusion

This post will address another ambiguity in the "10% buffer" Rule 18f-4 provides for excluding the notional amount of derivative transactions that hedge currency or interest rate risks ("Hedging Derivatives")...

United StatesFinance and Banking

This post will address another ambiguity in the "10% buffer" Rule 18f-4 provides for excluding the notional amount of derivative transactions that hedge currency or interest rate risks ("Hedging Derivatives") when calculating the Derivatives Exposure of a Limited Derivatives User. The ambiguity is whether, once the notional amount of a Hedging Derivative exceeds the 10% buffer, a fund should add back to its Derivatives Exposure (a) the entire notional amount of the Hedging Derivative or (b) only the notional amount in excess of the 10% buffer. We chose answer (b) in our post on The 10% Buffer and Changes in Hedged Investments. This post explains why.

The Problematic Situation

In our earlier post, we posited a situation in which a fund had sold 80 of the September 2022 Euro FX Futures to hedge equity investments with a value of €10 million, which then fell to €9 million. As Euro FX Futures have a notional amount of €125,000, 72 contracts would now be sufficient to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from