Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 DECEMBER 2015

Getting A Deal Done In Delaware Without Revlon

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

In 2004, KKR & Co. LP, the well-known publicly traded investment company ("KKR"), formed KKR Financial Corp., a Maryland real estate investment trust ("KKR Financial"), which in 2005 engaged in a public offering.

United StatesFinance and Banking

In its recent decision of Corwin v. KKR Financial Holdings LLC, the Delaware Supreme Court did two things. It affirmed that a court will not apply an entire fairness review to a merger transaction so long as the board is disinterested and the acquirer does not have "effective control," no matter how closely tied the acquirer is to the operations of the target company. Second, it championed the informed and uncoerced vote of a disinterested majority of shareholders as a cure for many sins of the M&A process, including the failure to follow Revlon.

In 2004, KKR & Co. LP, the well-known publicly traded investment company ("KKR"), formed KKR Financial Corp., a Maryland real estate investment trust ("KKR Financial"), which in 2005 engaged in a public offering. Then, in 2007, KKR Financial restructured so that it became a subsidiary of KKR Financial Holdings LLC, a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership ("KFN"). The subsequent going-private transaction in 2013-2014,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from