Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 OCTOBER 2018

Commenters Support CFTC Proposal To Simplify IM Notice Requirement

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

The National Futures Association ("NFA"), ISDA and SIFMA, among others, expressed support for the CFTC proposal to amend Rules 23.700-704.

United StatesFinance and Banking

The National Futures Association ("NFA"), ISDA and SIFMA, among others, expressed support for the CFTC proposal to amend See previous coverage of the proposal here.)

The NFA called the existing requirements "unnecessarily prescriptive," and generally supported the various amendments proposed by the CFTC. The NFA also requested that the CFTC clarify whether Rule 23.704(a) requires a quarterly report when a swap dealer's collateral management arrangements are not in compliance with a counterparty contract (as opposed to only when they are in compliance).

SIFMA and ISDA expressed broad support for the CFTC-proposed amendments. In addition, the groups (i) asked the CFTC to clarify whether the notice regarding IM segregation rights must be provided only at the beginning of the first swap between the parties or whether it could be provided earlier - e.g., at the outset of the relationship - and (ii) suggested that the quarterly notice requirement in Rule 23.704(a)

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from