Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 SEPTEMBER 2015

Claims Dismissed From RMBS Class Action Against Citibank

However, the court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims relating to the other 24 trusts.

United StatesFinance and Banking

On September 8, 2015, the Southern District of New York dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, a large portion of claims from a derivative class action alleging that Citibank NA, as trustee of 27 trusts, had breached its contractual, statutory, and common law duties in connection with $17 billion of pooled loans. Plaintiffs invoked federal jurisdiction based on the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 ("TIA") and asked the court to take supplemental jurisdiction over the accompanying state law claims. Plaintiffs asserted TIA claims in connection with just 3 of the 27 trusts. The court held that those claims could proceed, denying Citibank's argument that the TIA does not provide a private right of action. However, the court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims relating to the other 24 trusts. The court concluded that supplemental jurisdiction was permissible, but that it should nonetheless decline such jurisdictions because the claims as to each

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from