Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 APRIL 2016

2016 Mitigating Risk: Key Litigation Developments - Financial Services >> Limitations On Motions To Dismiss In FINRA Arbitration

Davis+Gilbert LLP
Davis+Gilbert LLP
Contributor
Davis+Gilbert LLP

Davis+Gilbert LLP

Legal mastery is critical but not enough. Even the best legal strategies must work in tandem with...

View firm profile
Explore more from Davis+Gilbert LLP

There are advantages to financial institutions in resolving disputes with investors through arbitration under the auspices of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) rather than in court.

United StatesFinance and Banking

There are advantages to financial institutions in resolving disputes with investors through arbitration under the auspices of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) rather than in court. These include streamlined procedures, reduced discovery costs, faster decisions, and finality. There are, however, important procedural issues to consider when approaching FINRA arbitrations, one of which is the near-total absence of a defendant's ability to move for dismissal of claims before trial.

FINRA's arbitration rules state that motions to dismiss prior to trial are discouraged. Although this mindset exists at many arbitration bodies, FINRA has codified this policy and, indeed, has taken it a step further. The pertinent rule expressly limits motions to dismiss prior to trial to two narrow and rare circumstances:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from