Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JANUARY 2018

Supreme Court Decides Jurisdiction For WOTUS Rule Challenges

Today, in a much-anticipated decision, the Supreme Court unanimously held that district courts are the proper courts to hear challenges to the WOTUS Rule, an Obama-era regulation...

United StatesEnvironment

Today, in a much-anticipated decision, the Supreme Court unanimously held that district courts are the proper courts to hear challenges to the "Waters of the United States" ("WOTUS") Rule, an Obama-era regulation that expansively defined waters subject to Clean Water Act jurisdiction. The decision overturns a Sixth Circuit ruling that federal appeals courts maintain the proper jurisdiction to hear such challenges. Writing for the Court, Justice Sotomayor found that "Congress has made clear that rules like the WOTUS Rule must be reviewed first in federal district courts."

While the Trump Administration has proposed to rescind the WOTUS Rule, the implications of the Court's decision could still be far-reaching. For example, if and when a new definition of "waters of the United States" is proposed, such challenges will quickly advance in district courts without being bogged down in questions of jurisdiction. Additionally, with a narrower reading of the relevant Clean

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from