Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JULY 2026

Feds Repeal Regulatory Definition Of "Harm” Under Endangered Species Act

Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Duane Morris LLP

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service have rescinded the decades-old regulatory definition of "harm" under the Endangered Species Act, fundamentally altering how habitat modification is treated under federal wildlife protection law. This final rule eliminates the longstanding practice of treating significant habitat degradation as prohibited "take," relying instead on statutory text and post-Chevron deference principles. The decision raises critical questions about executi

United StatesEnvironment

Regulatory Definition

By John M. Simpson. On July 14, 2026, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (collectively, the “Services”) published a final rule rescinding the longstanding regulatory definition of “harm” under the Endangered Species Act. The rescission removes the definition from 50 CFR Parts 17 and 222, effectively ending the decades-old practice of treating significant habitat modification or degradation as a form of prohibited “take” under Section 9 of the ESA. The rule represents one of the most consequential reinterpretations of the ESA in the statute’s history.

What the Rule Does

Since 1975, FWS’s regulatory definition of “harm” had included habitat modification within the meaning of “take.” The 1981 revision narrowed the definition somewhat, requiring that habitat modification “actually kills or injures wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding or sheltering.” NMFS adopted a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from