Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 AUGUST 2013

Does The Clean Air Act Preempt State Law Nuisance Claims Against Power Plants?

Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit said "no" and the decision has already prompted at least one new air emissions lawsuit against a power plant owner.

United StatesEnvironment

Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit said "no" and the decision has already prompted at least one new air emissions lawsuit against a power plant owner.

In Kristie Bell, et al. v. Cheswick Generating Station, GenOn Power Midwest, L.P., No. 12-1426 (3d Cir. Aug. 20, 2013), the Third Circuit held that the Clean Air Act (CAA) does not prevent Pennsylvania residents from alleging that air emissions from a Pennsylvania power plant have created a nuisance under Pennsylvania state law.  The decision holds, in essence, that the CAA's "comprehensive" scheme for regulating air emissions is not so comprehensive as to preempt all air-related tort claims.

The Bell decision turns on the fact that the plaintiffs are relying on state tort law against an in-state source of air pollution; they are not relying on federal common law or trying to impose Pennsylvania's tort law on an out-of-state source.  The decision means that the plaintiffs – a putative class

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from