Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 AUGUST 2016

Despite Pollution Exclusion, Insurer On Hook For Contamination In Indiana

The Northern District of Indiana rejected the insurer's assertion that its pollution exclusion clauses unambiguously included all contaminants.

United StatesEnvironment

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Northern District of Indiana rejected the insurer's assertion that its pollution exclusion clauses unambiguously included all contaminants.

Indiana, unlike other jurisdictions, is pro-insured when it comes to providing coverage for damages arising from pollution events. This is so even where the insurance policy attempts to exclude coverage.

Old Republic Ins. Co. v. Gary-Chicago Int'l Airport Auth., No. 15-cv-00281 (N.D. Ind., July 25, 2016), is the latest in a line of cases to hold that, in Indiana, if an insurer wants to exclude coverage for pollution, the policy must state with specificity the contaminants and pollutants for which coverage is excluded.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from