Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 SEPTEMBER 2017

D.C. Circuit Vacates U.S. EPA's Decision To Stay Implementation Of Methane Rules

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Six environmental groups challenged EPA's efforts to stay the methane rule.

United StatesEnvironment

On July 3, 2017 in a tightly contested 2–1 decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that EPA lacked authority under the CAA to unilaterally stay portions of a final rule establishing methane regulations for new oil and gas infrastructure. See Clean Air Council, et al. v. Administrator of EPA, et al., No. 17-1145. 

In June 2016, EPA promulgated a final rule to establish "new source performance standards" for fugitive emissions of methane and other pollutants by the oil and natural gas industry. The rule took effect in August 2016. Several industry groups then petitioned EPA to reconsider the rule, arguing reconsideration was mandatory because the final rule included provisions not set forth in the proposed rule. Finding the petitions raised at least one objection warranting reconsideration, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt announced that EPA would issue a 90-day stay of compliance under Section 307 of the CAA. Two months later, EPA

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from