Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 AUGUST 2026

DC Circuit Upholds EPA's PFAS Hazardous-Substance Designations Under CERCLA

K&L Gates
K&L Gates
Contributor
K&L Gates

K&L Gates

The Firm K&L Gates is an integrated, international law firm. As a single global law firm, truly...

View firm profile
Explore more from K&L Gates

The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit has upheld EPA's designation of PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances under CERCLA, rejecting industry challenges on statutory authority, procedural notice, and cost-benefit analysis grounds. This decision reinforces EPA's regulatory authority over PFAS chemicals and carries significant implications for companies involved in manufacturing, transporting, or disposing of materials containing these substances, potentially exposing them to substantial CERCLA liability

United StatesEnvironment

On 18 August 2026, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit (the Court) denied consolidated industry petitions challenging the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 2024 designation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The decision leaves the designation—and its release-reporting and potential Superfund-liability consequences—fully in place.1 See our alert (dated 7 May 2024) for more details on the final rule. 

The petitioners advanced three grounds to support the rule be vacated: (1) EPA exceeded its statutory authority in its interpretation of the term “may present substantial danger” in CERCLA’s definition of a hazardous substance, (2) EPA failed to provide adequate notice of its cost-benefit analysis, and (3) EPA allegedly acted arbitrarily by regulating despite uncertainty over future response actions and costs. The Court

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from