Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 AUGUST 2015

D.C. Circuit Holds That Petitioners Lack Standing To Challenge Carbon Sequestration Rule

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

The petitioners argued that the carbon dioxide emissions used in geologic sequestration are not "solid waste" and, therefore, not subject to RCRA, negating the need for the conditional exclusion.

United StatesEnvironment

As previously reported in the Spring 2015 issue of The Climate Report, the Carbon Sequestration Council, its member Southern Company Services, and the American Petroleum Institute ("API") filed a petition for review of EPA's final rule promulgated under the Resource Conversation and Recovery Act ("RCRA") that conditionally excluded from the definition of "hazardous waste" hazardous carbon dioxide streams that are injected into Class IV wells for purposes of geologic sequestration and that meet other criteria. Carbon Sequestration Council & S. Co. Servs. Inc. v. EPA, No. 14-1046.

The petitioners argued that the carbon dioxide emissions used in geologic sequestration are not "solid waste" and, therefore, not subject to RCRA, negating the need for the conditional exclusion.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from