Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2013

Court Rejects Challenge To California’s Cap-And-Trade Carbon Offset Program

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

Recently, a California state court has rejected a challenge to an important component of California's cap-and-trade scheme, its emission offset program.

United StatesEnvironment

On January 25, 2013, a California state court rejected a challenge to an important component of California's cap-and-trade scheme, its emission offset program. In the first legal decision regarding the program since its compliance obligations began on January 1, 2013, the San Francisco Superior Court in Citizens Climate Lobby v. California Air Resources Board denied a challenge to the offset standards designed by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Two citizens groups, Citizens Climate Lobby (CCL) and Our Children's Earth Foundation, brought the action against CARB.

Under CARB's cap-and-trade program, developed pursuant to the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32),1 certain projects that reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can apply to receive offset credits for each ton of GHG reduction. These credits can then be sold to regulated entities, who must acquire allowances or offsets for each ton of GHG emitted, and can satisfy up to eight

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from