Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 NOVEMBER 2018

Additional Stormwater Regulation On The Horizon In California—And Elsewhere?

After a ruling by Judge Stephen V. Wilson of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Los Angeles Waterkeeper, et al v. Pruitt, et al, case number 2:17-cv-03454 (August 9, 2018).

United StatesEnvironment

After a ruling by Judge Stephen V. Wilson of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Los Angeles Waterkeeper, et al v. Pruitt, et al, case number 2:17-cv-03454 (August 9, 2018), additional permitting requirements for stormwater discharges may be on the horizon in California and elsewhere.  Judge Wilson's ruling requires that where EPA has determined that stormwater discharges are contributing to water quality impairment in a watershed, it must "either (1) require NPDES permits for the discharges or (2) enforce [the Clean Water Act's} total proscription of discharges of pollutants" without a permit.

The Los Angeles Waterkeeper and other groups filed suit to require EPA, under Section 402(p)(2)(e) of the Clean Water Act, to utilize its "residual designation authority" to restrict stormwater discharges into watersheds in which it has found that stormwater discharges contribute to the failure of the waters to achieve water quality standards. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from