Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 FEBRUARY 2025

Sustainable Energy & Infrastructure Litigation Updates — February 2025

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Following a bench trial, on January 10, 2025, Judge Reed O'Connor of the US District Court of the Northern District of Texas held that the managers of a company's 401(k) retirement plans...

United StatesEnergy and Natural Resources

Following a bench trial, on January 10, 2025, Judge Reed O'Connor of the US District Court of the Northern District of Texas held that the managers of a company's 401(k) retirement plans had breached their fiduciary duty by allowing their investment decisions to be impacted by ESG interests. Specifically, the court held that “[w]hile it is permissible to consider ESG risks when done through a strictly financial lens . . . ESG cannot stand on its own. . . . [as] ERISA does not permit a fiduciary to pursue a non-pecuniary interest no matter how noble it might view the aim.” This is the first decision to consider whether ESG-focused investing of a 401(k) plan was in accordance with fiduciary duty principles, and the finding by the court that such actions constituted a breach of fiduciary duty will likely influence both other lawsuits and industry players.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from