Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 AUGUST 2011

It's An On-Demand Bond, Isn't It?

It has been said that a name is an artificial and meaningless convention. What matters is what something is, not what it is called.

United StatesEnergy and Natural Resources

What's in a name?

It has been said that a name is an artificial and meaningless convention. What matters is what something is, not what it is called. The same is true in the world of guarantees and on-demand bonds.

In our client alert of 17 May 2011, we looked at the need for demands to comply strictly with the terms of on-demand bonds. This alert considers the fundamental question as to whether the security instrument you thought was an on-demand bond is actually a guarantee or vice versa.

To recap, the idea is that with guarantees, particular conditions, such as the seller's default, need to be established before the secondary obligation to pay has to be fulfilled, whereas, with on-demand bonds payment has to be made if the demand is in compliance with the terms of the bond.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from