Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 AUGUST 2022

Energy & Sustainability Litigation Updates — August 2022

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

In June 2022, the Supreme Court issued its decision in West Virginia v. EPA, which held that, under the "major questions doctrine,"...

United StatesEnergy and Natural Resources

In June 2022, the Supreme Court issued its decision in West Virginia v. EPA, which held that, under the "major questions doctrine," the EPA lacked the authority under the Clean Air Act to devise emissions caps based on the approach of the Obama Administration's EPA (i.e., by attempting to shift electric generating power from fossil fuels to renewable energy). This ruling effectively torpedoed a significant measure to combat climate change (at least in the absence of Congressional action) and also appears to limit the authority of the EPA and similar regulatory agencies in their future efforts. The implications and consequences of this ruling are still being assimilated by industry and practitioners, and it is anticipated to have wide-ranging and far-reaching effects on environmental litigation in the future.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from