Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 NOVEMBER 2015

Crude-By-Rail Update: PHMSA Rejects Administrative Challenges To CBR Rule

BakerHostetler
BakerHostetler
Contributor
BakerHostetler

BakerHostetler

Recognized as an innovator and one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler helps...

View firm profile
Explore more from BakerHostetler

Despite challenging oil prices and a decrease in the volume of crude oil traveling by rail, recent events have renewed the spotlight on crude-by-rail (CBR) transportation.

United StatesEnergy and Natural Resources

Despite challenging oil prices and a decrease in the volume of crude oil traveling by rail,1 recent events have renewed the spotlight on crude-by-rail (CBR) transportation. First, two trains derailed in Wisconsin last weekend – one carrying ethanol and the other hauling crude oil.2 Second, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) reaffirmed its commitment to its CBR Rule.

Although the Wisconsin derailments resulted in no injuries, the crude oil derailment caused home evacuations and spilled roughly 1,000 gallons, and the ethanol derailment spilled an estimated 20,000 gallons directly into the Mississippi River. The incidents will likely refocus public and special interest group ire on CBR at a sensitive time when the fate of the CBR Rule rests with the judicial system.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from