Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 OCTOBER 2019

1st Circuit Dismisses $3.66 Billion Class Action Against Eversource, Avangrid

Steptoe LLP
Steptoe LLP
Contributor
Steptoe LLP

Steptoe LLP

Steptoe International (UK) LLP has built a strong reputation for providing top-quality regulatory,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Steptoe LLP

The "filed rate" doctrine prohibits collateral attacks on tariff rates, terms, and conditions established by federal and state regulatory agencies.

United StatesEnergy and Natural Resources

In a notable decision affirming the continuing vitality of the filed rate doctrine, the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld the dismissal of a $3.66 billion-dollar consumer class action brought against Eversource Energy and Avangrid, Inc. in Breiding v. Eversource Energy, No. 18-1995 (Sept. 18, 2019), which alleged manipulation of the New England energy markets. The "filed rate" doctrine prohibits collateral attacks on tariff rates, terms, and conditions established by federal and state regulatory agencies. The First Circuit's decision in Breiding v. Eversource Energy illustrates that the doctrine continues to stand as a first line of defense against antitrust claims and similar state law claims challenging conduct governed by regulator-approved tariffs.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from