Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JUNE 2018

Weingarten Rights Only Apply When Requested - What Constitutes A Legally Sufficient Request?

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
Explore more from Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart

In Circus Circus Casinos, a divided three-member panel undertook a factual analysis of whether an employee had provided adequate notice to the employer of his desire for representation at a disciplinary interview.

United StatesEmployment and HR

The recent split decision of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in Circus Circus Casinos, Inc., 366 NLRB No. 110 (June 15, 2018), is a reminder that the validity of an employee's request for Weingarten assistance at an investigatory interview or disciplinary hearing often turns on the nature of the request and the factual circumstances surrounding it.

Under Board and Supreme Court precedent in NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc., 420 U.S. 251 (1975), an employer is required to accept an employee's request for the presence of a union representative or other third party at a meeting which the employee reasonably believes may result in discipline. However, it is the employee's responsibility to inform the employer of the request; the employer is not required to divine the desire for representation unless reasonably so informed by the employee. See Weingarten, 420 U.S. at 257 (the right to union representation at a disciplinary interview arises "only in situations where

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from