Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 JANUARY 2017

Third Circuit Clarifies Plaintiff's Burden Of Proof For USERRA Claims

The Third Circuit held that, in a failure-to-promote USERRA case, plaintiffs need not plead or prove that they are objectively qualified for the position sought in order to meet their initial burden of proof.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Third Circuit held that, in a failure-to-promote USERRA case, plaintiffs need not plead or prove that they are objectively qualified for the position sought in order to meet their initial burden of proof.

Last week, in Carroll v. Delaware River Port Authority (link), the Third Circuit affirmed the District of New Jersey's denial of summary judgment to the Port Authority in a case alleging violations of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act ("USERRA"), a federal statute protecting employees from employment bias because of their military service.  In so holding, the Third Circuit clarified the employee's burden of proof for a USERRA claim.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from