Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JUNE 2019

The Bubbler - June 2019

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

The court's ruling serves as an illustration that noncompliant practices can have very costly effects on employers.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Welcome to June! As we head into the summer, the employment law world continues to heat up! We have rounded up the most recent developments impacting employers for your summer reading pleasure here.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently found in Fort Bend County v. Davis that Title VII's requirement that employees give the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or a state enforcement agency the chance to resolve their claims before bringing them in court is not "jurisdictional," and therefore the failure to exhaust defense can be waived if it is not raised in a timely manner. The Supreme Court also decided that it will hear three cases in its next term, which, taken together, will test the textual boundaries of Title VII with respect to the meaning of sex discrimination. Stay tuned here for more coverage of those decisions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from