Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JULY 2023

Stand And Deliver: PAGA Plaintiffs May Still Litigate Representative Claims Not Compelled Into Arbitration

K&L Gates
K&L Gates
Contributor
K&L Gates

K&L Gates

The Firm K&L Gates is an integrated, international law firm. As a single global law firm, truly...

View firm profile
Explore more from K&L Gates

Plaintiff Erik Adolph delivered food to customers through the Uber Eats platform as an independent contractor. As a condition of providing services, Adolph agreed to individually arbitrate work-related...

United StatesEmployment and HR

HIGHLIGHTS OF ADOLPH V. UBER TECH., INC.

  • PAGA representatives retain standing to prosecute non-individual PAGA claims in court, even when their individual PAGA claims are compelled into arbitration.
  • Courts may still stay non-individual PAGA claims pending resolution of the individual arbitration actions.
  • An arbitrator's finding regarding whether an employee is "aggrieved," and therefore can pursue non-individual PAGA claims following a stay, is binding on the court.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Erik Adolph delivered food to customers through the Uber Eats platform as an independent contractor. As a condition of providing services, Adolph agreed to individually arbitrate work-related claims against Uber, including those under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA).1

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from