Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 SEPTEMBER 2018

Sixth Circuit Holds Full-Time Presence At Work Is Not An Essential Function Under ADA

In a July 17, 2018 opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held "full-time presence at work is not an essential function."

United StatesEmployment and HR

In a July 17, 2018 opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held “full-time presence at work is not an essential function.” In so holding, the Sixth Circuit reversed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the employer in the matter of Hostettler v. The College of Wooster that was based upon the proposition that full-time employment was an essential function of a human resources generalist position.

Heidi Hostettler was hired by the College of Wooster into a human resources generalist position while she was four months pregnant. Throughout the interview process, Hostettler was open about her pregnancy, and the employer offered her 12 weeks of unpaid maternity leave under the FMLA even though she did not otherwise qualify for leave under the law. As part of Hostettler’s regular duties, she helped managers with performance improvement plans, participated in recruiting new hires, designed training programs, and answered phone calls

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from