Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 DECEMBER 2014

Second Circuit Rejects Plan’s Claim For Reimbursement From Another Plan

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

Under such circumstances, the plan is considered to have an equitable lien by agreement.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Where an ERISA plan specifically sets forth in the plan document its rights to reimbursement/subrogation vis-à-vis a plan participant then there is no requirement that recovery be conditioned on the plan being able to trace the recovered monies to the original benefit payment.  Under such circumstances, the plan is considered to have an equitable lien by agreement.  The Second Circuit recently had occasion, however, to consider whether an equitable lien could attach against another plan that provided overlapping medical coverage to a participant.  The Court held that it did not.  In so ruling, the Court concluded that the plan's claims did not seek appropriate equitable relief because there was no agreement between the parties that identified a particular share of a specific fund to which the plan was entitled.  Recognizing that its holding could deprive an ERISA plan of any remedy in cases of this nature and could potentially create an incentive for similarly-situated

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from