Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MARCH 2013

Second Circuit Holds That Whether On-Time Attendance Is An Essential Function Is A Fact-Based Determination

A discussion related to the fact that employers should not assume that on-time attendance is an essential function of every job, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently ruled.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Employers beware – you cannot assume that on-time attendance is an essential function of every job, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently ruled. In McMillian v. City of New York, the court held that the determination of which jobs compel on-time attendance requires a fact-based analysis, which must include the consideration whether an employee's "physical presence" in the workplace is in fact necessary.  

In an era where more employers are allowing telecommuting, remote work, and flexible hours, employers that want their employees to report to a physical place and be on time should take steps now to make sure that these requirements are documented so that it can be proven that attendance is in fact an "essential function of the job."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from