Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 MAY 2008

San Francisco All Over?

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

With the passage of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") in 1974, employers came to believe that a balkanized system of state and local rules governing group health plans would never develop because this federal law mandated uniform national regulation of employee benefit plans.

United StatesEmployment and HR

With the passage of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") in 1974, employers came to believe that a balkanized system of state and local rules governing group health plans would never develop because this federal law mandated uniform national regulation of employee benefit plans. The State of Maryland and Suffolk County, New York, recently enacted group health plan mandates. When those mandates were challenged, the federal courts ruled that they were invalid because ERISA gave exclusive power to the federal government to regulate employee benefit plans (discussed below). The City of San Francisco (the "City") also adopted its own group health plan mandate, in the form of an ordinance that became effective on January 1, 2008. The new health plan law, officially titled the "San Francisco Health Care Security Ordinance" (the "Ordinance"), is also referred to as "Healthy San Francisco." An

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from