Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 AUGUST 2013

Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act Reintroduced In Both Chambers

Legislation that would change burden of proof and causation standards for a number of employment discrimination claims was reintroduced in the House and Senate on Tuesday.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Legislation that would change burden of proof and causation standards for a number of employment discrimination claims was reintroduced in the House and Senate on Tuesday. The Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act (POWADA) (H.R. 2852, S. 1391) would overturn two Supreme Court decisions that toughened the burdens of proof for employees bringing discrimination claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) or advancing retaliation claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

In 2009, the Court in Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc. held that a plaintiff bringing a claim under the ADEA must show by a preponderance of the evidence that age was the "but for" cause of the employer's adverse employment decision. In order to establish a viable claim under Title VII, by contrast, an employee need only demonstrate that the protected category such as race or sex was a contributing factor in the adverse employment decision. In such a "mixed

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from