Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 OCTOBER 2016

Lyft Wins Background Check Class Action Claim

Apparently, even a "no decision" decision by the U.S. Supreme Court can still establish precedent.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Apparently, even a "no decision" decision by the U.S. Supreme Court can still establish precedent.

Relying on a Spring 2016 SCOTUS decision, a federal magistrate judge in California dismissed a proposed class action lawsuit by a driver against the ride-sharing company, Lyft, Inc., which had alleged privacy violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero ruled on Wednesday, October 5, 2016 that the driver, Michael Nokchan, lacked "standing" – the right to sue – guaranteed under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, because he could not demonstrate he suffered "concrete harm" as a result of Lyft's manner of conducting background checks on job applicants.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from