Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JUNE 2017

In Nationwide Conditional Certification, Evidence Still Matters

As employers well know, the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") permits employees to file suits on behalf of themselves and others who are "similarly situated."

United StatesEmployment and HR
Employment Law And Litigation
Employment Law And Litigation
Author LinkedIn connections

Article by: James McQuade, Zachary Scott and Andrea Johnson.

As employers well know, the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") permits employees to file suits on behalf of themselves and others who are "similarly situated." 29 U.S.C. 216(b).  In practice, this often means large employers find themselves defending against a single or handful of employees attempting to certify a collective action that includes hundreds or thousands of employees nationwide.  Many times, the collective group includes employees in states where the plaintiffs have never worked.  However, as a NY federal court recently reminded us, while plaintiffs' evidentiary burden is not onerous at this stage, lack of knowledge about the employees in other states continues to be an obstacle for plaintiffs in obtaining conditional certification.  On the opposite side of the coin, this failure of evidence can be utilized by defendant employers to narrow the proposed collective group or altogether prevent

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from