Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 AUGUST 2015

Frivolous Whistleblower Claim Yields Stiff Sanctions

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

The New Jersey Appellate Division recently upheld sanctions of more than $191,000 to Sunhillo Corporation in connection with its defense of claims under the New Jersey Conscientious Employee Protection Act.

United StatesEmployment and HR

The New Jersey Appellate Division recently upheld sanctions of more than $191,000 to Sunhillo Corporation (Company) in connection with its defense of claims under the New Jersey Conscientious Employee Protection Act, Fulton v. Sunhillo Corp., No. A-3950-13T2, 2015 WL 4390550 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Jul. 20, 2015), finding the whistleblower claims frivolous.

Background

In December 2007, the Company hired Ronald Fulton (Plaintiff) as its Director of Business Development to develop new business and new markets. In late 2008 and early 2009, Plaintiff raised concerns about whether the Company was complying with federal export requirements in its business dealings with China and the Company investigated. The Company terminated Plaintiff's employment in September 2009 based on the stated reason that he did not develop sufficient business. Plaintiff responded by filing a pro se complaint in October 2009, seeking $5 million in damages and alleging that he had been

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from