Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 APRIL 2014

FEHA Limitations Period Cannot Be Shortened by Agreement

A California Court of Appeal held that an employer’s attempt to shorten the one year statute of limitations was against public policy and unenforceable.

United StatesEmployment and HR

In Ellis v. U.S. Security Associates, a California Court of Appeal held that an employer's attempt to shorten the one year statute of limitations to file a harassment claim under FEHA was against public policy and unenforceable.

Ellis was hired as a security guard for Security Associates, and as part of the hiring process, executed an employment application that stated that she must file any claim or lawsuits related to her service within six months of the employment action, and further required her to "waive any statute of limitations to the contrary." When Ellis later filed a harassment claim and related claims against Security Associates, her former employer moved to dismiss the claim as being untimely pursuant to the six month limitation in the employment application (even though it was timely under FEHA's one year statute of limitation).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from