Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 NOVEMBER 2009

Employment Bulletin - October 19, 2009

Recently, in affirming a decision by the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination ("MCAD"), the Massachusetts Appeals Court held that a racial epithet can constitute discrimination in terms and conditions of employment.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Recently, in affirming a decision by the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination ("MCAD"), the Massachusetts Appeals Court held that a racial epithet can constitute discrimination in terms and conditions of employment. In Augis Corp. v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, an African-American employee alleged that a supervisor had directed a profane and offensive racial slur towards him. The employee was subsequently terminated for violating a work rule, and he filed a charge with the MCAD alleging that he had been treated differently and terminated due to his race. While the employee relied on the supervisor's statement in support of his claim, he did not allege that he was subjected to harassment or a hostile work environment. After a hearing, the MCAD found that the employer lawfully terminated the employee and rejected the employee's claim of disparate treatment. Nonetheless, the MCAD determined that the supervisor's slur constituted

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from