Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 APRIL 2014

Employment And Benefits Developments: Same-Sex Couples

On Aug. 29, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service issued a Revenue Ruling answering many questions raised by the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Windsor earlier this summer.

United StatesEmployment and HR

On Aug. 29, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service issued a Revenue Ruling answering many questions raised by the Supreme Court's ruling in United States v. Windsor earlier this summer. In Windsor, the court held that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, which defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman for federal law purposes, was unconstitutional because it denied same-sex couples equal protection under the law. The IRS's first formal response to the Windsor decision holds that for all federal tax purposes:

1. The term "marriage" includes a marriage between two individuals of the same sex, provided those individuals are lawfully married under state law (or the laws of a territory or foreign jurisdiction with the legal authority to sanction marriage);

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from