Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JANUARY 2014

Employee Benefits Update - January 2014

On December 16, 2013, the Supreme Court settled a long-standing split among various Circuit Courts of Appeals.

United StatesEmployment and HR

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS PLAN PROVISION SHORTENING LIMITATIONS PERIOD

On December 16, 2013, the Supreme Court settled a long-standing split among various Circuit Courts of Appeals, holding that an ERISA plan may impose a limitation on the time period during which a participant can sue for benefits that begins to run prior to the date on which the participant's final appeal is denied. See Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.

ERISA section 502(a)(1)(B) allows participants in ERISA benefit plans to sue to recover benefits under the plan that are wrongfully denied. Unlike ERISA claims for breach of fiduciary duty, ERISA itself does not provide a limitation period for a claim under ERISA section 502(a)(1)(B). Rather, courts have looked to plan documents themselves, when applicable, or to analogous state statutes to determine the applicable limitation periods. Additionally, courts have held that a claim under ERISA section 501(a)(1)(B) does

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from