Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JULY 2018

Don't Judge A Conditional Certification Motion By Its Cover

Seyfarth Synopsis: A New York federal court once again denied a motion for conditional certification of a nationwide collective action against Barnes & Noble.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Seyfarth Synopsis: A New York federal court once again denied a motion for conditional certification of a nationwide collective action against Barnes & Noble.  The ruling highlights that, even though the burden for "first stage" certification is modest, courts are willing to apply a "modest plus" approach after discovery relevant to conditional certification has taken place.  It also shows the potential positive impact the Supreme Court's recent Encino Motorcars decision may have for employers opposing conditional certification.

Foreword

Once upon a time, we blogged about a decision in the Southern District of New York denying conditional certification of a nationwide collective of café managers at Barnes & Noble.  Undeterred, the managers again sought conditional certification, this time after the parties conducted extensive discovery focused on issues pertinent to conditional certification.  Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker concluded this story by again

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from