Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JULY 2011

Defining "Solicitation" In Restrictive Covenant Agreements

Davis+Gilbert LLP
Davis+Gilbert LLP
Contributor
Davis+Gilbert LLP

Davis+Gilbert LLP

Legal mastery is critical but not enough. Even the best legal strategies must work in tandem with...

View firm profile
Explore more from Davis+Gilbert LLP

In "Bessemer Trust Company v. Branin", the Court of Appeals held that an executive who sold his company and later joined a competitor could assist his new employer in a variety of ways to pitch his former clients without violating the law on non-solicitation.

United StatesEmployment and HR

In Bessemer Trust Company v. Branin, the Court of Appeals held that an executive who sold his company and later joined a competitor could assist his new employer in a variety of ways to pitch his former clients without violating the law on non-solicitation. This is an important development for service-sector businesses and companies that acquire them.

Background

Francis S. Branin owned a company that provided financial advice to high net-worth individuals. He later sold his business to Bessemer and became an employee there. Branin ultimately left Bessemer to join Stein Roe, a rival financial advisory firm. Bessemer had not required him to sign a non-compete agreement, restrictive covenant, or agree to any post-employment restriction when Bessemer bought Branin's company, nor at any time afterward.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from