Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 SEPTEMBER 2024

Defendants Secure Another Win On Discretionary Use Of 401(k) Plan Forfeitures

Groom Law Group, Chartered
Groom Law Group, Chartered
Contributor
Groom Law Group, Chartered

Groom Law Group, Chartered

Groom Law Group has been at the forefront of developments in the nation’s benefits, health, and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Groom Law Group, Chartered

On September 19, 2024, the Southern District of California dismissed claims brought by a 401(k) plan participant against Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. regarding the use of forfeitures to offset...

United StatesEmployment and HR

On September 19, 2024, the Southern District of California dismissed claims brought by a 401(k) plan participant against Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. regarding the use of forfeitures to offset future employer contributions. As summarized below, the decision largely tracks a decision in favor of Hewlett Packard ("HP") earlier this year, furthering a split in rulings on the issue by federal courts in California.

The Opinion

The central theme of plaintiff's claims against Thermo Fisher was that, in choosing to use forfeitures to reduce employer contributions instead of reducing administrative expenses charged to participants, the plan participants were harmed. The plan document provided the plan with discretionary authority over how forfeitures were allocated, allowing all or part to be used to "pay reasonable expenses of the Plan" or "reduce . . . Discretionary Contributions..."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from