Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 SEPTEMBER 2005

Courts Reject Labor Commissioner Policies

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

In Conley v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company, a California Court of Appeal ruled that employers may make vacation deductions for partial-day absences of employees without jeopardizing their exempt status. While federal law has allowed such deductions under the FLSA, California’s Division of Labor Standards Enforcement had a different interpretation of California law.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Courts Reject Labor Commissioner Policies1

Conley v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company

Employers May Deduct Vacation Leave for Partial-Day Absences of Exempt Employees

In Conley v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company,2 a California Court of Appeal ruled that employers may make vacation deductions for partial-day absences of employees without jeopardizing their exempt status. While federal law has allowed such deductions under the FLSA, California’s Division of Labor Standards Enforcement ("DLSE") had a different interpretation of California law. In order to be exempt under California law, employees generally must be paid on a "salary basis." This means that an exempt employee’s pay cannot be subject to reduction because of variations in the number of hours the employee works. Until recently, the DLSE took the position that a vacation deduction for a partial-day absence was inconsistent with an employee’s exempt status even though the employee received the same amount of pay as if he or

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from