Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 NOVEMBER 2025

California Expands Pay Transparency Requirements

Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Contributor
Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has approximately 3,200 lawyers across 51 locations in the United States,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Greenberg Traurig

California continues to lead the way in pay transparency legislation with the recent enactment of Senate Bill 642 (SB 642). Effective Jan. 1, 2026, SB 642 amends California's pay transparency requirements...

United StatesEmployment and HR

California continues to lead the way in pay transparency legislation with the recent enactment of Senate Bill 642 (SB 642). Effective Jan. 1, 2026, SB 642 amends California's pay transparency requirements, mandating that employers include anticipated equity compensation, such as stocks and stock options, when publishing a job opening. While this change further broadens the scope of information employers must provide to prospective employees, as of right now, it does not expressly change how "wages" are defined in other disputes under the California Labor Code.

What Does SB 642 Require?

Previously, California's pay transparency law required employers to disclose the pay scale for positions in job postings, but this did not explicitly include non-cash compensation such as stocks or stock options. SB 642 now expands the definition of "wages" and "wage rates" to include "all forms of pay, including but not limited to, salary, overtime pay, bonuses, stock, stock

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from