Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JULY 2012

A Closer Look At The Brinker Decision

On April 12, 2012, the California Supreme Court decided Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. Superior Court (Hohnbaum), pending since 2008.

United StatesEmployment and HR

On April 12, 2012, the California Supreme Court decided Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. Superior Court (Hohnbaum), pending since 2008. We reported on the decision in a Legal Alert, and in an extended webinar, which you can access here and here. Because it's such a significant decision, more remains to be said.

Much-Needed Clarification

California recognizes two kinds of meal periods: off-duty and on-duty. An on-duty meal period is permitted only when the nature of the work prevents the employee from being relieved of all duty, the employee is paid, and there is a written agreement with a right to revoke the agreement. Unless there is a valid on-duty meal period agreement, an employer is required to affirmatively relieve employees of duty during a meal period of at least 30 uninterrupted minutes (e.g., must be permitted to leave premises).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from