Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 FEBRUARY 2017

A Cautionary Comment On PAGA (Or Plaintiffs' Attorneys Getting Around) Legislative Intent

Sometimes, plaintiffs' attorneys have circumvented a key aspect of the California Legislature's intent in enacting PAGA: limiting standing to pursue penalties for Labor Code violations to those employees who were actually harmed.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Seyfarth Synopsis: Sometimes, plaintiffs' attorneys have circumvented a key aspect of the California Legislature's intent in enacting PAGA: limiting standing to pursue penalties for Labor Code violations to those employees who were actually harmed. Though a new California bill could halt those attempts, PAGA plaintiffs' wiliness warrants a cautionary comment to the Legislature to ensure that any amendment furthers—rather than further frustrates—the original legislative intent.

A New PAGA Bill: Employers should be optimistic that the California Legislature continues to propose bills seeking to curtail PAGA abuse. One recently introduced bill would advance three laudable goals, to close loopholes and preclude arguments that have encouraged absurd interpretations of the original PAGA statute. But the Legislature should mindfully proceed. While one proposed change is straightforward, a second creates confusion absent a quick fix, and a third requires revisiting

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from