Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JULY 2016

White Collar Roundup - July 2016

In the case, defendant Melissa Beecroft was convicted of participating in a multimillion-dollar residential mortgage-fraud scheme in the Las Vegas area.

United StatesCriminal Law

Forfeiture Can Be Big, but Not THAT Big 

United States v. Beecroft vacated a $107 million forfeiture order as "grossly disproportional." In the case, defendant Melissa Beecroft was convicted of participating in a multimillion-dollar residential mortgage-fraud scheme in the Las Vegas area. The scheme involved the use of straw buyers who would purportedly buy homes, sometimes with 100% mortgage financing, and distribute the funds to the defendant and others. All told, the scheme involved more than 400 straw transactions for 227 properties that were purchased for more than $100 million. Most of the homes went into default, and the lenders lost tens of millions of dollars. Beecroft was intimately involved and made more than $400,000 from commissions and fees generated by the scheme. At sentencing, the district court ordered Beecroft to pay approximately $2 million in restitution to the victims. It also ordered her to forfeit approximately $107 million, which represented

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from