Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 OCTOBER 2016

Third Circuit Revives Reverse False Claims Act Case But Acknowledges Burden On Defendants

On October 5, 2016, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit remanded a "reverse" False Claims Act (FCA) case to the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for further proceedings.

United StatesCriminal Law

On October 5, 2016, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit remanded a "reverse" False Claims Act (FCA) case to the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for further proceedings. The court's decision in United States ex rel. Custom Fraud Investigations, LLC v. Victaulic Company, Case No. 15-2169 (3d Cir., Oct. 5, 2016), breathes new life into a case that was previously dismissed by the district court in September 2014, and provides extensive discussion about how reverse claims operate in the era of the 2009 Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act (FERA) amendments.

The case involves nondiscretionary import regulations—set forth in the Tariff Act of 1930—that apply to the pipe fitting industry. These regulations mandate that pipe fittings manufactured outside the United States must be marked with the country of origin; in contrast, pipe fittings manufactured in the United States are typically unmarked. Failure to properly mark foreign-manufactured pipe

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from